book-based test «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)

Henry Kissinger and the Realpolitik Model: A Spiral Dynamics Perspective

Henry Kissinger, who would turn 100 years old on May 27, 2023, is one of the most controversial figures in American history. He served as National Security Advisor and Secretary of State under Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, and his policies had a profound impact on the course of the Cold War.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in alternative approaches to foreign policy, such as Constructivism and Liberal Internationalism. These approaches emphasize the importance of cooperation and dialogue and reject the idea that power is the only currency in international relations.

It remains to be seen whether Kissinger's Realpolitik will continue to be relevant in the 21st century. However, there is no doubt that his legacy will continue to be debated for many years.

Realpolitik, derived from the German words "real" meaning realistic, practical, and actual, and "Politik" meaning politics, is an approach to diplomacy and political decision-making that prioritizes practical considerations and existing circumstances over explicit ideological beliefs or moral principles. It shares similarities with the philosophical perspectives of realism and pragmatism. It is often referred to simply as pragmatism in politics, signifying the pursuit of policies grounded in practicality and realism.

Although Realpolitik is generally viewed as a neutral or positive concept, it can also carry negative connotations, suggesting political strategies perceived as coercive, amoral, or Machiavellian. Notable proponents of Realpolitik in the 20th century include Henry Kissinger, George F. Kennan, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Hans-Dietrich Genscher, and political figures like Charles De Gaulle and Lee Kuan Yew.

Realpolitik, a political philosophy that places practical considerations above ideological ones, finds its application in various realms of international relations. Henry Kissinger, renowned for his roles as the United States Secretary of State and National Security Advisor during Richard Nixon's and Gerald Ford's presidential administrations, was a notable practitioner of Realpolitik. From 1969 to 1977, he played a pivotal role in shaping United States foreign policy, implementing significant initiatives such as the policy of détente with the Soviet Union, establishing relations with the People's Republic of China, conducting shuttle diplomacy in the Middle East to resolve the Yom Kippur War, and negotiating the Paris Peace Accords, which marked the conclusion of American involvement in the Vietnam War.

Central to the principles of Realpolitik are power, balance, and negotiation. Kissinger recognized the importance of power dynamics in international relations and understood that states operate within a competitive environment where power plays a significant role. He aimed to maintain a delicate balance of power between nations, carefully managing relationships and alliances to safeguard the national interest of the United States.

Negotiation was a key instrument in Kissinger's approach to Realpolitik. Rather than relying solely on military force or coercion, he emphasized the value of diplomacy and skillful negotiations to achieve favorable outcomes for the United States. Kissinger believed in leveraging the art of negotiation to advance the country's interests while considering the complex interplay of political, economic, and military forces in the international arena.

In summary, Realpolitik, as practiced by Henry Kissinger, is characterized by a pragmatic understanding of the world, a focus on power dynamics, the pursuit of a balance of power, and skillful negotiations to secure the national interest of the United States. It prioritizes managing and navigating the existing global landscape rather than attempting to reshape it according to a specific image or ideology.

Realpolitik, the political philosophy associated with Henry Kissinger, is characterized by a pragmatic and realistic approach to international relations. It revolves around a clear-eyed understanding of the world as it truly exists rather than pursuing idealistic or wishful thinking. Instead of attempting to reshape the world according to America's image or ideals, Kissinger focused on managing and navigating the existing global dynamics to secure the national interest of the United States.

Henry Kissinger's approach to Realpolitik primarily revolved around pursuing economic and military power for the United States. In his early work, which originated as his dissertation and later evolved into his first book, Kissinger argued that foreign policymakers are evaluated based on their ability to discern shifts in political, military, and economic power within the international system—and subsequently capitalize on those changes in favor of their own country. This particular foreign policy model does not assign any role to political values such as democracy and human rights, which are distinguishing aspects of the United States in the global arena.

Realpolitik can be evaluated in terms of Spiral Dynamics, a model that describes the development of human values and consciousness. 

At first glance, Realpolitik is associated with the Orange value system is associated with modernity, capitalism, and the pursuit of personal achievement and progress. He values efficiency, strategic planning, and material success. Realpolitik's emphasis on strength, balance, negotiation, and command power to protect the national interest reflects the focus of Orange's value system on achieving practical goals and maximizing results.

The Orange value system emphasizes individualism, rationality, and pragmatism. He strives to achieve goals and success through strategic thinking, competition, and the pursuit of self-interest.

Realpolitik's focus on practical considerations, circumstances, and prioritization of results over moral or ethical principles in a historical context is realized through numerous and regular military conflicts.

The United States has been involved in various military engagements throughout history. Here is a chronological list of some notable U.S. military involvements:

1. Korean War (1950-1953): The United States and other UN forces intervened in response to North Korea's invasion of South Korea.

2. Guatemala (1954): The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) supported a coup against the democratically elected government of Guatemala.

3. Indonesia (1958): The U.S. supported the Indonesian government during its conflict with secessionist movements.

4. Cuba (1959-1961): The U.S. was involved in efforts to undermine the Cuban government following the Cuban Revolution. This included the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961.

5. Guatemala (1960): The U.S. supported a coup against the Guatemalan government.

6. Congo (1964): The U.S. supported the Congolese government during political instability and armed conflict.

7. Laos (1964-1973): The U.S. conducted a covert military campaign in Laos as part of the Vietnam War, targeting communist forces.

8. Vietnam War (1961-1973): The United States engaged in a large-scale military intervention in Vietnam to support South Vietnam against communist forces.

9. Cambodia (1969-1970): The U.S. conducted military operations in Cambodia during the Vietnam War as part of efforts to disrupt enemy supply routes.

10. Guatemala (1967-1969): The U.S. supported the Guatemalan government's counterinsurgency efforts during internal conflict.

11. Grenada (1983): The U.S. led a military intervention in Grenada to remove a Marxist government and protect American citizens.

12. Lebanon (1983, 1984): The U.S. military was involved in peacekeeping efforts in Lebanon during a period of civil war.

13. Libya (1986): The U.S. conducted airstrikes against Libya in response to alleged Libyan involvement in terrorist attacks.

14. El Salvador (1980s): The U.S. supported the Salvadoran government in its fight against leftist guerrilla groups during a period of civil war.

15. Nicaragua (1980s): The U.S. supported anti-Sandinista rebels (Contras) in Nicaragua during the Cold War.

16. Iran (1987): The U.S. conducted military operations in the Persian Gulf against Iranian forces during the Iran-Iraq War.

17. Panama (1989): The U.S. invaded Panama to remove its leader, Manuel Noriega.

18. Persian Gulf War (1991): The U.S. led a coalition of international forces to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait.

19. Somalia (1993): The U.S. participated in a UN peacekeeping mission in Somalia, which included the infamous Battle of Mogadishu (portrayed in the film "Black Hawk Down").

20. Bosnia (1994, 1995): The U.S. participated in NATO airstrikes and peacekeeping efforts during the Bosnian War.

21. Sudan (1998): The U.S. launched airstrikes against a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan, citing suspicions of its involvement in producing chemical weapons.

22. Afghanistan (1998): The U.S. conducted missile strikes in Afghanistan in response to terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies.

23. Yugoslavia (1999): The U.S. participated in NATO airstrikes against Yugoslavia during the Kosovo War.

24. Yemen (2002): The U.S. carried out a drone strike in Yemen, targeting an individual suspected of having links to terrorism.

25. Iraq (1991-2003): The U.S. and the United Kingdom conducted regular military operations in Iraq following the Persian Gulf War until the 2003 invasion.

26. Iraq (2003-2015): The U.S. led a coalition in Iraq's invasion and subsequent occupation, resulting in the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime.

27. Afghanistan (2001-2015): The U.S., in response to the 9/11 attacks, led a military campaign to topple the Taliban regime and combat terrorism in Afghanistan.

28. Pakistan (2007-2015): The U.S. carried out drone strikes targeting militant groups in Pakistan's tribal regions.

29. Somalia (2007-2008, 2011): The U.S. conducted military operations, including airstrikes and special forces raids, against Islamist extremist groups in Somalia.

30. Yemen (2009, 2011): The U.S. conducted airstrikes in Yemen, targeting Al-Qaeda and affiliated groups.

31. Libya (2011, 2015): The U.S. and NATO allies conducted airstrikes in Libya as part of a military intervention during the Libyan Civil War.

Thus, the principles of Realpolitik are most closely aligned with the Beige model in Spiral Dynamics. Beige is the first stage of development in Spiral Dynamics, characterized by a focus on survival and basic needs. In this stage, people are motivated by power and control, and they see the world as a place where only the strong survive. They are also focused on maintaining balance and order and are willing to negotiate to achieve their goals.

Here are some of the critical characteristics of the Beige model that align with Realpolitik:

  • Focus on survival and basic needs: Realpolitik is a pragmatic approach to politics focused on achieving concrete goals. It is not concerned with lofty ideals or moral principles but rather with the practical realities of power and influence.
  • Motivation by power and control: Realpolitik is based on the belief that power is the ultimate currency in the world of politics. Those who have power can get what they want, and those who do not are at the mercy of those who do.
  • Focus on maintaining balance and order: Realpolitik is also concerned with maintaining balance and order in the world. This is because chaos and instability can lead to violence and conflict, threatening the survival of those in power.
  • Willingness to negotiate: Realpolitik is not about always getting what you want. It is about being willing to compromise and negotiate to achieve your goals. This is because no one can achieve their goals independently and must work with others to get things done.

Of course, Realpolitik is not the only approach to politics aligned with the Beige model. Other approaches, such as Machiavellianism and Realism, also share some of the same characteristics. However, Realpolitik is perhaps the most explicit in its focus on power, balance, and negotiation.

Join the conversation and share your insights on the fascinating intersection of Henry Kissinger, Realpolitik, and Spiral Dynamics.

Valerii Kosenko
Product owner SaaS pet project SDTEST®

Valerii was qualified as a social pedagogue-psychologist in 1993 and has since applied his knowledge in project management.
Valerii obtained a Master's degree and the project and program manager qualification in 2013. During his Master's program, he became familiar with Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) and Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii took various Spiral Dynamics tests and used his knowledge and experience to adapt the current version of SDTEST.
Valerii is the author of exploring the uncertainty of the V.U.C.A. concept using Spiral Dynamics and mathematical statistics in psychology, more than 20 international polls.
This Post has 0 Comments
Reply to
Cancel a reply
Leave your comment
Enter your e-mail as desired
Hi there! Let me ask you, do you already familiar with Spiral Dynamics?