bahay/Blog/AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.

At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!

The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!

This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.

The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!

The SDTEST^® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.

Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level.

Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST^® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.

Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!

Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Artipisyal na katalinuhan at pagtatapos ng sibilisasyon

chart Ugnayan

VUCA

May ay isang istatistika ng makabuluhang ugnayan sa

Normal na pamamahagi, ni William Sealy Gosset (mag -aaral) r = 7.63

Hindi normal na pamamahagi, ni Spearman r = 0.31

Ipakita lamang ang mga resulta > r = 7.63

Mga Katanungan sa Poll

Lahat ng mga katanungan

1) Kaligtasan (magkano ang sumasang -ayon ka o hindi sumasang -ayon?)

2) Kontrol (magkano ang sumasang -ayon ka o hindi sumasang -ayon?)

Pamamahagi

Positibong ugnayan sa,%

Negatibong ugnayan sa,%

Normal

1.1 Answer 1 1.8 Answer 2 4.8 Answer 3 1.4 Answer 4 2.5 Answer 5 #1	-6.6 Answer 2 -5.2 Answer 10 #1
1.7 Answer 6 4 Answer 7 3 Answer 8 7.9 Answer 9 #2	-5.6 Answer 11 -4.5 Answer 6 -3.8 Answer 12 #2

Normal

3.6 Answer 10 5.5 Answer 4 #1	-5.8 Answer 1 -0.2 Answer 2 -0.5 Answer 2 -1.4 Answer 3 -1.1 Answer 5 #1
4.9 Answer 6 0.6 Answer 12 7.7 Answer 8 0.2 Answer 9 #2	-7.5 Answer 11 -1.6 Answer 6 -1.4 Answer 7 #2

Normal

4.4 Answer 2 #1	-0.9 Answer 1 -0.9 Answer 2 -3.3 Answer 3 -0.1 Answer 10 -0.1 Answer 4 #1
8.5 Answer 6 0.9 Answer 8 #2	-1.8 Answer 11 -1.4 Answer 6 -1 Answer 7 -7 Answer 12 -2.2 Answer 9 #2

Normal

4.6 Answer 2 5.1 Answer 10 8 Answer 4 #1	-9.9 Answer 1 -3 Answer 2 -3.9 Answer 3 -1.2 Answer 5 #1
5.6 Answer 11 3.2 Answer 6 3.5 Answer 12 #2	-0.2 Answer 6 -6.2 Answer 7 -0.1 Answer 8 -8.1 Answer 9 #2

Normal

11.1 Answer 1 4 Answer 2 1.9 Answer 3 #1	-0.7 Answer 2 -1.9 Answer 10 -8.4 Answer 4 -5.4 Answer 5 #1
6.2 Answer 11 1.3 Answer 7 6.1 Answer 12 #2	-4.1 Answer 6 -4 Answer 6 -1 Answer 8 -3.1 Answer 9 #2

Hindi
normal

0.2 Answer 2 0.6 Answer 3 11.4 Answer 5 #1	-0.3 Answer 1 -4.8 Answer 2 -1.1 Answer 10 -5.8 Answer 4 #1
1.7 Answer 11 1.1 Answer 7 3.3 Answer 12 6.1 Answer 9 #2	-2.7 Answer 6 -3.2 Answer 6 -4.2 Answer 8 #2

Normal

7.1 Answer 1 2.8 Answer 2 1.7 Answer 3 0.4 Answer 10 #1	-1.5 Answer 2 -4 Answer 4 -5.6 Answer 5 #1
2.8 Answer 11 0.7 Answer 6 1.8 Answer 6 3.2 Answer 7 0.4 Answer 9 #2	-1.3 Answer 12 -10.9 Answer 8 #2

I-export sa MS Excel

Ang pag-andar na ito ay magagamit sa iyong sariling VUCA polls

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf

2023.11.27

Valerii Kosenko

May -ari ng Produkto SaaS Pet Project Sdtest®

Si Valerii ay kwalipikado bilang isang panlipunang pedagogue-psychologist noong 1993 at mula nang inilapat ang kanyang kaalaman sa pamamahala ng proyekto.
Nakuha ni Valerii ang isang Master's Degree at ang Project and Program Manager Qualification noong 2013. Sa panahon ng kanyang programa ng Master, naging pamilyar siya sa Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) at Spiral Dynamics.
Kinuha ni Valerii ang iba't ibang mga pagsubok sa dinamika ng spiral at ginamit ang kanyang kaalaman at karanasan upang iakma ang kasalukuyang bersyon ng Sdtest.
Si Valerii ay may -akda ng paggalugad ng kawalan ng katiyakan ng V.U.C.A. Konsepto gamit ang mga spiral dinamika at istatistika ng matematika sa sikolohiya, higit sa 20 internasyonal na botohan.

Ang post na ito ay mayroon 0 Mga Komento

Tumugon sa

Kanselahin ang isang tugon

Iwanan ang iyong puna