book-based test «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Sponsors

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Fears

Country
Language
-
Mail
Recalculate
Critical value of the correlation coefficient
Normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0316
Normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0316
Non Normal distribution, by Spearman r = 0.0013
DistributionNon
Normal
Non
Normal
Non
Normal
NormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
All questions
All questions
My greatest fears are
My greatest fears are
Answer 1-
Weak positive
0.0550
Weak positive
0.0289
Weak negative
-0.0175
Weak positive
0.0947
Weak positive
0.0376
Weak negative
-0.0180
Weak negative
-0.1565
Answer 2-
Weak positive
0.0189
Weak negative
-0.0055
Weak negative
-0.0379
Weak positive
0.0641
Weak positive
0.0499
Weak positive
0.0110
Weak negative
-0.0975
Answer 3-
Weak positive
5.49E-6
Weak negative
-0.0093
Weak negative
-0.0455
Weak negative
-0.0440
Weak positive
0.0495
Weak positive
0.0752
Weak negative
-0.0220
Answer 4-
Weak positive
0.0441
Weak positive
0.0300
Weak negative
-0.0235
Weak positive
0.0172
Weak positive
0.0367
Weak positive
0.0231
Weak negative
-0.1018
Answer 5-
Weak positive
0.0277
Weak positive
0.1282
Weak positive
0.0106
Weak positive
0.0747
Weak positive
0.0001
Weak negative
-0.0162
Weak negative
-0.1779
Answer 6-
Weak positive
0.0004
Weak positive
0.0046
Weak negative
-0.0611
Weak negative
-0.0095
Weak positive
0.0254
Weak positive
0.0854
Weak negative
-0.0373
Answer 7-
Weak positive
0.0128
Weak positive
0.0333
Weak negative
-0.0661
Weak negative
-0.0301
Weak positive
0.0521
Weak positive
0.0691
Weak negative
-0.0540
Answer 8-
Weak positive
0.0659
Weak positive
0.0720
Weak negative
-0.0263
Weak positive
0.0141
Weak positive
0.0382
Weak positive
0.0161
Weak negative
-0.1357
Answer 9-
Weak positive
0.0762
Weak positive
0.1612
Weak positive
0.0058
Weak positive
0.0622
Weak negative
-0.0067
Weak negative
-0.0487
Weak negative
-0.1836
Answer 10-
Weak positive
0.0772
Weak positive
0.0663
Weak negative
-0.0131
Weak positive
0.0271
Weak positive
0.0353
Weak negative
-0.0112
Weak negative
-0.1349
Answer 11-
Weak positive
0.0634
Weak positive
0.0516
Weak negative
-0.0076
Weak positive
0.0102
Weak positive
0.0262
Weak positive
0.0256
Weak negative
-0.1279
Answer 12-
Weak positive
0.0448
Weak positive
0.0916
Weak negative
-0.0334
Weak positive
0.0314
Weak positive
0.0352
Weak positive
0.0282
Weak negative
-0.1536
Answer 13-
Weak positive
0.0727
Weak positive
0.0930
Weak negative
-0.0396
Weak positive
0.0277
Weak positive
0.0444
Weak positive
0.0163
Weak negative
-0.1645
Answer 14-
Weak positive
0.0822
Weak positive
0.0891
Weak negative
-0.0041
Weak negative
-0.0119
Weak positive
0.0058
Weak positive
0.0142
Weak negative
-0.1209
Answer 15-
Weak positive
0.0554
Weak positive
0.1256
Weak negative
-0.0339
Weak positive
0.0121
Weak negative
-0.0145
Weak positive
0.0249
Weak negative
-0.1165
Answer 16-
Weak positive
0.0730
Weak positive
0.0233
Weak negative
-0.0378
Weak negative
-0.0383
Weak positive
0.0730
Weak positive
0.0174
Weak negative
-0.0782


Export to MS Excel
This functionality will be available in your own VUCA polls
Ok

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
Valerii Kosenko
Product Owner SaaS SDTEST®

Valerii was qualified as a social pedagogue-psychologist in 1993 and has since applied his knowledge in project management.
Valerii obtained a Master's degree and the project and program manager qualification in 2013. During his Master's program, he became familiar with Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) and Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii is the author of exploring the uncertainty of the V.U.C.A. concept using Spiral Dynamics and mathematical statistics in psychology, and 38 international polls.
This Post has 0 Comments
Reply to
Cancel a reply
Leave your comment
×
YOU FIND AN ERROR
PROPOSE YOUR CORRECT VERSION
Enter your e-mail as desired
Send
Cancel
Bot
sdtest
1
Hi there! Let me ask you, do you already familiar with Spiral Dynamics?