آزمون بر اساس کتاب «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
حامی

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


ترس

کشور
زبان
-
Mail
دوباره محاسبه کردن
مقدار بحرانی ضریب همبستگی
توزیع عادی ، توسط ویلیام سیلی گوست (دانشجو) r = 0.0316
توزیع عادی ، توسط ویلیام سیلی گوست (دانشجو) r = 0.0316
توزیع غیر عادی ، توسط Spearman r = 0.0013
توزیعغیر
عادی
غیر
عادی
غیر
عادی
طبیعیطبیعیطبیعیطبیعیطبیعی
تمام س questions الات
تمام س questions الات
بزرگترین ترس من این است
بزرگترین ترس من این است
Answer 1-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0550
مثبت ضعیف
0.0289
منفی ضعیف
-0.0175
مثبت ضعیف
0.0947
مثبت ضعیف
0.0376
منفی ضعیف
-0.0180
منفی ضعیف
-0.1565
Answer 2-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0189
منفی ضعیف
-0.0055
منفی ضعیف
-0.0379
مثبت ضعیف
0.0641
مثبت ضعیف
0.0499
مثبت ضعیف
0.0110
منفی ضعیف
-0.0975
Answer 3-
مثبت ضعیف
5.49E-6
منفی ضعیف
-0.0093
منفی ضعیف
-0.0455
منفی ضعیف
-0.0440
مثبت ضعیف
0.0495
مثبت ضعیف
0.0752
منفی ضعیف
-0.0220
Answer 4-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0441
مثبت ضعیف
0.0300
منفی ضعیف
-0.0235
مثبت ضعیف
0.0172
مثبت ضعیف
0.0367
مثبت ضعیف
0.0231
منفی ضعیف
-0.1018
Answer 5-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0277
مثبت ضعیف
0.1282
مثبت ضعیف
0.0106
مثبت ضعیف
0.0747
مثبت ضعیف
0.0001
منفی ضعیف
-0.0162
منفی ضعیف
-0.1779
Answer 6-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0004
مثبت ضعیف
0.0046
منفی ضعیف
-0.0611
منفی ضعیف
-0.0095
مثبت ضعیف
0.0254
مثبت ضعیف
0.0854
منفی ضعیف
-0.0373
Answer 7-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0128
مثبت ضعیف
0.0333
منفی ضعیف
-0.0661
منفی ضعیف
-0.0301
مثبت ضعیف
0.0521
مثبت ضعیف
0.0691
منفی ضعیف
-0.0540
Answer 8-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0659
مثبت ضعیف
0.0720
منفی ضعیف
-0.0263
مثبت ضعیف
0.0141
مثبت ضعیف
0.0382
مثبت ضعیف
0.0161
منفی ضعیف
-0.1357
Answer 9-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0762
مثبت ضعیف
0.1612
مثبت ضعیف
0.0058
مثبت ضعیف
0.0622
منفی ضعیف
-0.0067
منفی ضعیف
-0.0487
منفی ضعیف
-0.1836
Answer 10-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0772
مثبت ضعیف
0.0663
منفی ضعیف
-0.0131
مثبت ضعیف
0.0271
مثبت ضعیف
0.0353
منفی ضعیف
-0.0112
منفی ضعیف
-0.1349
Answer 11-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0634
مثبت ضعیف
0.0516
منفی ضعیف
-0.0076
مثبت ضعیف
0.0102
مثبت ضعیف
0.0262
مثبت ضعیف
0.0256
منفی ضعیف
-0.1279
Answer 12-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0448
مثبت ضعیف
0.0916
منفی ضعیف
-0.0334
مثبت ضعیف
0.0314
مثبت ضعیف
0.0352
مثبت ضعیف
0.0282
منفی ضعیف
-0.1536
Answer 13-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0727
مثبت ضعیف
0.0930
منفی ضعیف
-0.0396
مثبت ضعیف
0.0277
مثبت ضعیف
0.0444
مثبت ضعیف
0.0163
منفی ضعیف
-0.1645
Answer 14-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0822
مثبت ضعیف
0.0891
منفی ضعیف
-0.0041
منفی ضعیف
-0.0119
مثبت ضعیف
0.0058
مثبت ضعیف
0.0142
منفی ضعیف
-0.1209
Answer 15-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0554
مثبت ضعیف
0.1256
منفی ضعیف
-0.0339
مثبت ضعیف
0.0121
منفی ضعیف
-0.0145
مثبت ضعیف
0.0249
منفی ضعیف
-0.1165
Answer 16-
مثبت ضعیف
0.0730
مثبت ضعیف
0.0233
منفی ضعیف
-0.0378
منفی ضعیف
-0.0383
مثبت ضعیف
0.0730
مثبت ضعیف
0.0174
منفی ضعیف
-0.0782


صادرات به اکسل
این قابلیت در نظرسنجی های VUCA شما در دسترس خواهد بود
خوب

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
والری
مالک محصول SaaS SDTEST®

والری در سال 1993 به عنوان یک معلم اجتماعی-روانشناس صلاحیت یافت و از آن زمان دانش خود را در مدیریت پروژه به کار گرفته است.
والری در سال 2013 مدرک کارشناسی ارشد و صلاحیت مدیر پروژه و برنامه را دریافت کرد. در طول دوره کارشناسی ارشد خود، با Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) و Spiral Dynamics آشنا شد.
والری نویسنده کتاب بررسی عدم قطعیت V.U.C.A است. مفهوم با استفاده از دینامیک مارپیچی و آمار ریاضی در روانشناسی و 38 نظرسنجی بین المللی
این پست دارد 0 نظرات
پاسخ دادن به
پاسخ را لغو کنید
نظر خود را بگذارید
×
شما یک خطا
پیشنهاد نسخه صحیح خود را
ایمیل خود را به عنوان مورد نظر را وارد کنید
ارسال
لغو کردن
Bot
sdtest
1
سلام! بگذارید از شما بپرسم ، آیا قبلاً با دینامیک مارپیچ آشنا هستید؟