AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0727
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0727
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.003
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0666
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0209
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0941
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1169
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0089
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0469
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0197
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0169
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0027
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0434
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0239
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0400
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0073
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0555
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0228
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0256
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0045
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0553
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0232
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0105
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0074
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0329
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0047
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0149
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0412
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0342
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0074
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0449
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0094
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0261
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0230
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0463
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0346
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0300
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0519
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0118
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0530
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0733
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0702
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0155
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0470
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0129
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0643
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0935
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0592
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0012
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0092
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0034
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0233
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0149
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0058
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0830
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0595
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0326
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0791
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0463
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0229
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0238
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0378
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0297
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0811
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0113
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0566
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0132
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0401
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0533
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0207
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0031
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0593
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0308
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0224
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0023
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0128
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0592
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0166
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0136
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0552
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0087
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0333
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0523
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0403
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0660
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0087
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0436
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0947
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0346
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0132
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0111
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0178
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0731
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0036
Answer 10-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0009
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0838
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0344
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0762
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0236
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0102
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0767


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas SaaS SDTEST®

1993 metais Valerii įgijo socialinio pedagogo-psichologo kvalifikaciją ir nuo tada savo žinias pritaikė projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projektų bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Magistrantūros studijų metu susipažino su Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii yra V.U.C.A. netikrumo tyrinėjimo autorius. koncepcija, naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, ir 38 tarptautinės apklausos.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?