AI Assistants Boost Beginners More Than Experts, Study Shows Correlation

There once was an AI named Chat who was really good at repeating back information it already knew. One day, Chat was given to some office workers [1] to help them with their jobs. Some of the workers were experts at their jobs, while others were still learning.  


At first, Chat helped all the workers get more work done faster - even the experts! But soon, the experts noticed something funny. The workers who were still learning got way MORE help from Chat. The new workers improved a lot using Chat, doing their work faster and better than ever before!   


The experts wondered why Chat didn't help them as much. That's when they realized - that Chat is an expert at repeating back facts but can't come up with brand new ideas. So, for workers who already knew those facts, Chat didn't offer them that much new help. But for newer workers still learning those basics, Chat was able to teach them so much more!


This shows a correlation - as in, two things that relate to each other and change together. The more expert a worker already was, the less helpful Chat was for them. But for newer workers, Chat could help them almost as much as the experts! It's because of their different starting points. Chat has a limit to how expert it can be. So, the closer a worker already was to Chat's expertise, the less new stuff Chat offered them.


The experts and newbies improved at different rates thanks to Chat. Their own expertise compared to Chat's matters for how much more they can learn. That connection in how much they improve is the correlation!


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "A.I. and the end of civilization" poll. It asks people to rate at the agree or disagree level. 


Now imagine 100 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their rated answers about the danger of AI.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the danger of AI. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “A.I. and the end of civilization“. The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Dirbtinis intelektas ir civilizacijos pabaiga

Šalis
kalba
-
Mail
Perskaičiuoti
Kritinė reikšmė koreliacijos koeficientas
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0759
Normalus platinimas, pateikė William Sealy Gosset (studentas) r = 0.0759
Ne normalus pasiskirstymas, autorius Spearman r = 0.0031
PaskirstymasNe
normalu
NormalusNe
normalu
NormalusNormalusNormalusNormalusNormalus
Visi klausimai
Visi klausimai
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
1) Saugumas (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 1-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0686
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0028
Silpnas teigiamas
0.1019
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1091
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0035
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0537
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0211
Answer 2-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0264
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0011
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0402
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0269
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0477
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0062
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0667
Answer 2-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0132
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0459
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0037
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0453
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0068
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0071
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0135
Answer 3-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0196
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0043
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0139
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0383
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0353
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0108
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0504
Answer 4-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0051
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0098
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0169
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0501
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0005
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0345
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0544
Answer 4-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0367
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0542
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0768
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0793
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0082
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0545
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0107
Answer 5-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0612
Silpnas teigiamas
0.1082
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0539
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0045
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0020
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0084
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0248
2) Kontrolė (kiek jūs sutinkate ar nesutinkate?)
Answer 6-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0279
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0226
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0680
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0472
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0219
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0732
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0540
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0106
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0276
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0434
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0318
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0883
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0171
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0466
Answer 7-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0190
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0300
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0366
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0025
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0111
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0466
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0122
Answer 8-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0292
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0087
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0121
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0572
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0066
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0174
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0402
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0094
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0284
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0510
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0344
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0755
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0132
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0292
Answer 9-
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.1112
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0444
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0076
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0029
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0123
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0772
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0237
Answer 10-
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0009
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0580
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0327
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0754
Silpnas neigiamas
-0.0265
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0027
Silpnas teigiamas
0.0832


Eksportas į MS Excel
Ši funkcija bus prieinama jūsų VUCA apklausose
Gerai



[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b2928076-5c52-43e9-8872-08fda2aa2fcf


2023.11.27
Valerii Kosenko
Produkto savininkas SaaS SDTEST®

1993 metais Valerii įgijo socialinio pedagogo-psichologo kvalifikaciją ir nuo tada savo žinias pritaikė projektų valdyme.
2013 m. Valerii įgijo magistro laipsnį ir projektų bei programų vadovo kvalifikaciją. Magistrantūros studijų metu susipažino su Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ir Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii yra V.U.C.A. netikrumo tyrinėjimo autorius. koncepcija, naudojant spiralinę dinamiką ir matematinę statistiką psichologijoje, ir 38 tarptautinės apklausos.
Šis įrašas turi 0 Komentarai
Atsakinėti į
Atšaukti atsakymą
Palikite savo komentarą
×
Rasite klaidą
SIŪLYTI SAVO Teisingas versija
Įveskite savo e-mail kaip norim
Siųsti
atšaukti
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Leiskite paklausti tavęs, ar jūs jau susipažinote su spiralės dinamika?