Home/Blogi/Feathered Correlations: Color Predicting Culture in Diverse Flocks After Disaster

Feathered Correlations: Color Predicting Culture in Diverse Flocks After Disaster

There were once colorful flocks of birds that lived together in a big forest. These flocks of birds had different ratios of beige birds, purple birds, red birds, blue birds, orange birds, green birds, yellow birds, and turquoise birds. These different proportions of colors influenced each flock's values, culture, and atmosphere. Their leaders made decisions based on the most common bird colors.

One day, after a bad storm, the flock leaders made tough choices to help their birds survive.

In Swift's flock, purple and green birds predominated. True to their adventurous nature, Swift sent the purple and green birds to find new food sources (unpaid vacation). She asked the orange birds to scout for materials to rebuild damaged nests because they loved to compete.

Feather's flock mainly had blue, who valued stability, and orange birds, who loved competition. The no-nonsense orange birds got right to work on repairs (no reduced staff). And the peaceful blue birds kept singing to lift spirits, so Feather changed nothing about their routines (nothing changed).

Hootie's flock had many sociable yellow birds who could always find a profitable solution for everyone and possessed a Win-Win-Win behavior. When the yellow birds' food storage was damaged, instead of reducing their rations (reduced salaries), Hootie asked the red birds to share the extra food they had gathered. So, yellow birds' food storage wasn't changed (no reduced salaries).

Over in Willa's flock, fun-loving turquoise birds were the majority. After the storm, Willa kept all her turquoise birds in their usual nests, singing songs since their cheerfulness helped the whole flock recover (nothing changed). But she had to ask the few red and orange birds to rebuild damaged nests belonging to elder beige birds temporarily.

Each diverse flock recovered based on its colorful culture and connections. But all birds worked cooperatively despite difficulties to continue thriving in the forest.

The SDTEST^® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.

Imagine also giving an "Actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month (yes / no)" poll. It asks people about actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month.

Now imagine 1'000 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST^® colors with their answers about actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month.

Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!

Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll "Actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month (yes / no)". The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Vitendo vya kampuni zinazohusiana na wafanyikazi katika mwezi uliopita (ndio / hapana)

chati Uwiano

VUCA

Muhimu thamani ya mgawo uwiano

Usambazaji wa kawaida, na William Sealy Gosset (Mwanafunzi) r = 0.0542

Usambazaji usio wa kawaida, na Spearman r = 0.0022

Onyesha matokeo tu > r = 0.0542

Usambazaji	Sio kawaida	Kawaida	Kawaida	Kawaida	Kawaida	Kawaida	Kawaida	Kawaida
Maswali yote Maswali yote Je! Ni hatua gani zimechukuliwa kuhusiana na wafanyikazi mwezi uliopita
Je! Ni hatua gani zimechukuliwa kuhusiana na wafanyikazi mwezi uliopita
Answer 1	-	Chanya dhaifu 0.1261	Chanya dhaifu 0.0390	Hasi dhaifu -0.0430	Hasi dhaifu -0.1108	Chanya dhaifu 0.0570	Chanya dhaifu 0.0126	Hasi dhaifu -0.0371
Answer 2	-	Hasi dhaifu -0.0173	Hasi dhaifu -0.0407	Chanya dhaifu 0.0046	Hasi dhaifu -0.0037	Hasi dhaifu -0.0251	Chanya dhaifu 0.0051	Chanya dhaifu 0.0620
Answer 3	-	Chanya dhaifu 0.0364	Hasi dhaifu -0.0133	Chanya dhaifu 0.0169	Hasi dhaifu -0.0147	Chanya dhaifu 0.0356	Hasi dhaifu -0.0538	Hasi dhaifu -0.0051
Answer 4	-	Chanya dhaifu 0.0388	Chanya dhaifu 0.0687	Hasi dhaifu -0.0044	Hasi dhaifu -0.0317	Chanya dhaifu 0.0227	Hasi dhaifu -0.0523	Hasi dhaifu -0.0188
Answer 5	-	Hasi dhaifu -0.0075	Chanya dhaifu 0.0330	Hasi dhaifu -0.0475	Chanya dhaifu 0.0152	Chanya dhaifu 0.0370	Hasi dhaifu -0.0041	Hasi dhaifu -0.0223
Answer 6	-	Hasi dhaifu -0.0113	Chanya dhaifu 0.0145	Chanya dhaifu 0.0431	Hasi dhaifu -0.0102	Hasi dhaifu -0.0071	Hasi dhaifu -0.0097	Hasi dhaifu -0.0126
Answer 7	-	Chanya dhaifu 0.0378	Chanya dhaifu 0.0328	Hasi dhaifu -0.0178	Hasi dhaifu -0.0395	Chanya dhaifu 0.0079	Hasi dhaifu -0.0064	Hasi dhaifu -0.0009
Answer 8	-	Hasi dhaifu -0.0169	Chanya dhaifu 0.0088	Hasi dhaifu -0.0003	Hasi dhaifu -0.0613	Hasi dhaifu -0.0311	Chanya dhaifu 0.0671	Chanya dhaifu 0.0342
Answer 9	-	Hasi dhaifu -0.0526	Chanya dhaifu 0.0274	Chanya dhaifu 0.0323	Chanya dhaifu 0.0639	Hasi dhaifu -0.0473	Hasi dhaifu -0.0134	Hasi dhaifu -0.0178

Export kwa MS Excel

Kazi hii itapatikana katika uchaguzi wako wa VUCA

Sawa

2023.12.09

Valerii Kosenko

Mmiliki wa bidhaa SaaS PET SDTEST ®

Valerii alihitimu kama mtaalam wa kisaikolojia wa kijamii mnamo 1993 na tangu sasa ametumia maarifa yake katika usimamizi wa mradi.
Valerii alipata digrii ya bwana na sifa ya meneja na sifa ya meneja wa programu mnamo 2013. Wakati wa mpango wa bwana wake, alifahamiana na Mradi wa barabara (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) na mienendo ya ond.
Valerii alichukua vipimo kadhaa vya mienendo ya ond na alitumia maarifa na uzoefu wake kurekebisha toleo la sasa la SDTest.
Valerii ndiye mwandishi wa kuchunguza kutokuwa na uhakika wa V.U.C.A. Dhana ya kutumia mienendo ya ond na takwimu za hisabati katika saikolojia, zaidi ya kura 20 za kimataifa.

Chapisho hili lina 0 Maoni

Jibu kwa

Ghairi jibu

Acha maoni yako