Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Enpresen ekintzak azken hilabeteko langileei dagokienez (bai / ez)

2) Enpresen ekintzak azken hilabeteko langileei dagokienez (gertakaria%)

3) Beldurrak

4) Nire herrialdera begira dauden arazo handienak

5) Zer nolakotasun eta gaitasunek erabiltzen dituzte liderrek talde arrakastatsuak eraikitzean?

6) Google. Taldearen eraginkortasuna duten faktoreak

7) Enplegu-eskatzaileen lehentasun nagusiak

8) Zerk egiten du buruzagi batek lider handia?

9) Zerk egiten du jendeak lanean arrakasta izatea?

10) Prest al zaude ordainketa gutxiago jasotzeko urrunetik lan egiteko?

11) Ageismoa badago?

12) AGEISMOA Karreran

13) Bizitzan adinismoa

14) Ageismoaren kausak

15) Jendeak amore ematen duen arrazoiak (Anna Vital-ek eginda)

16) Fidatu (#WVS)

17) Oxford zoriontasun inkesta

18) Ongizate psikologikoa

19) Non izango litzateke zure hurrengo aukera zirraragarriena?

20) Zer egingo duzu aste honetan zure buruko osasuna zaintzeko?

21) Nire iragana, oraina edo etorkizuna pentsatzen bizi naiz

22) Meritucrazi

23) Adimen artifiziala eta zibilizazioaren amaiera

24) Zergatik atzeratzen dira jendea?

25) Auto-konfiantza eraikitzeko generoaren aldea (IFD Allensbach)

26) Xing.com kulturaren ebaluazioa

27) Patrick Lencioni-k "Talde baten bost disfuntzioak"

28) Enpatia da ...

29) Zer funtsezkoa da lan eskaintza aukeratzerakoan espezialistak?

30) Zergatik jendeak aldaketari aurre egiten dio (Siobhán Mchale-k)

31) Nola erregulatzen dituzu zure emozioak? (Nawal Mustafa M.A.-k eginda)

32) 21 trebetasunak ordaintzen dizkizu betiko (Jeremiah Teo / 赵汉昇-k)

33) Benetako askatasuna da ...

34) Beste batzuekin konfiantza eraikitzeko 12 modu (Justin Wright-ek eginda)

35) Talentu handiko langile baten ezaugarriak (Talent Management Institute-k eginda)

36) 10 Zure taldea motibatzeko gakoak

37) Kontzientziaren Aljebra (Vladimir Lefebvre)

38) Three Distinct Possibilities of the Future (Clare W. Graves doktorearen eskutik)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Beldurrak

Charts Korrelazioa

VUCA

Korrelazio koefizientea balioa kritikoa

Banaketa normala, William Seally Gosset-en (Ikaslea) r = 0.0331

Banaketa normala ez da, Spearman-ek eginda r = 0.0013

Erakutsi emaitzak soilik > r = 0.0331

Banaketa	Normala ez	Normala ez	Normala ez	Ohiko	Ohiko	Ohiko	Ohiko	Ohiko
Galdera guztiak Galdera guztiak Nire beldurrik handiena da
Nire beldurrik handiena da
Answer 1	-	Positibo ahula 0.0562	Positibo ahula 0.0311	Negatiboa ahula -0.0164	Positibo ahula 0.0903	Positibo ahula 0.0301	Negatiboa ahula -0.0120	Negatiboa ahula -0.1534
Answer 2	-	Positibo ahula 0.0217	Positibo ahula 0.0011	Negatiboa ahula -0.0455	Positibo ahula 0.0660	Positibo ahula 0.0440	Positibo ahula 0.0117	Negatiboa ahula -0.0942
Answer 3	-	Negatiboa ahula -0.0034	Negatiboa ahula -0.0104	Negatiboa ahula -0.0419	Negatiboa ahula -0.0451	Positibo ahula 0.0462	Positibo ahula 0.0780	Negatiboa ahula -0.0204
Answer 4	-	Positibo ahula 0.0436	Positibo ahula 0.0362	Negatiboa ahula -0.0177	Positibo ahula 0.0150	Positibo ahula 0.0296	Positibo ahula 0.0189	Negatiboa ahula -0.0984
Answer 5	-	Positibo ahula 0.0298	Positibo ahula 0.1270	Positibo ahula 0.0133	Positibo ahula 0.0724	Negatiboa ahula -0.0002	Negatiboa ahula -0.0199	Negatiboa ahula -0.1742
Answer 6	-	Negatiboa ahula -0.0003	Positibo ahula 0.0089	Negatiboa ahula -0.0627	Negatiboa ahula -0.0074	Positibo ahula 0.0190	Positibo ahula 0.0825	Negatiboa ahula -0.0321
Answer 7	-	Positibo ahula 0.0123	Positibo ahula 0.0388	Negatiboa ahula -0.0684	Negatiboa ahula -0.0238	Positibo ahula 0.0468	Positibo ahula 0.0631	Negatiboa ahula -0.0517
Answer 8	-	Positibo ahula 0.0699	Positibo ahula 0.0857	Negatiboa ahula -0.0318	Positibo ahula 0.0150	Positibo ahula 0.0341	Positibo ahula 0.0125	Negatiboa ahula -0.1372
Answer 9	-	Positibo ahula 0.0666	Positibo ahula 0.1681	Positibo ahula 0.0094	Positibo ahula 0.0694	Negatiboa ahula -0.0131	Negatiboa ahula -0.0533	Negatiboa ahula -0.1815
Answer 10	-	Positibo ahula 0.0776	Positibo ahula 0.0744	Negatiboa ahula -0.0185	Positibo ahula 0.0224	Positibo ahula 0.0352	Negatiboa ahula -0.0135	Negatiboa ahula -0.1293
Answer 11	-	Positibo ahula 0.0585	Positibo ahula 0.0531	Negatiboa ahula -0.0094	Positibo ahula 0.0086	Positibo ahula 0.0195	Positibo ahula 0.0313	Negatiboa ahula -0.1200
Answer 12	-	Positibo ahula 0.0378	Positibo ahula 0.1030	Negatiboa ahula -0.0357	Positibo ahula 0.0350	Positibo ahula 0.0261	Positibo ahula 0.0297	Negatiboa ahula -0.1510
Answer 13	-	Positibo ahula 0.0642	Positibo ahula 0.1044	Negatiboa ahula -0.0454	Positibo ahula 0.0259	Positibo ahula 0.0424	Positibo ahula 0.0183	Negatiboa ahula -0.1595
Answer 14	-	Positibo ahula 0.0718	Positibo ahula 0.1034	Negatiboa ahula -0.0003	Negatiboa ahula -0.0085	Negatiboa ahula -0.0016	Positibo ahula 0.0074	Negatiboa ahula -0.1172
Answer 15	-	Positibo ahula 0.0550	Positibo ahula 0.1382	Negatiboa ahula -0.0418	Positibo ahula 0.0181	Negatiboa ahula -0.0163	Positibo ahula 0.0211	Negatiboa ahula -0.1183
Answer 16	-	Positibo ahula 0.0591	Positibo ahula 0.0276	Negatiboa ahula -0.0384	Negatiboa ahula -0.0397	Positibo ahula 0.0651	Positibo ahula 0.0280	Negatiboa ahula -0.0710

Export MS Excel

Funtzionalitate hau zure VUCA inkestetan eskuragarri egongo da

Ados

You can not only just create your poll in the Tarifa «V.U.C.A inkesta diseinatzaile» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the Tarifa «Inkestako denda», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing Tarifa «My SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

Valerii Kosenko

Produktuen jabea Saas Pet Project Sdtest®

Valerii Pedagogo-psikologo soziala zen 1993an eta geroztik, eta geroztik bere ezagutzak proiektuen kudeaketan aplikatu ditu.
Valerii-k Masterra eta Proiektua eta Programa Zuzendaritza titulua lortu zituen 2013. Masterreko programan, proiektuaren bide-orria ezagutu zuen (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Projektmanagement E. V.) eta espiral dinamika.
Valerii-k hainbat espiral dinamika proba egin zituen eta bere ezagutza eta esperientzia erabili zituen SDITren uneko bertsioa egokitzeko.
Valerii V.u.c.a-ren ziurgabetasuna esploratzeko egilea da. Kontzeptua espiral dinamika eta estatistika matematikoak psikologian, nazioarteko 20 galdeketa baino gehiago.

Post honek badu 0 Esaldiak

Erantzun

Erantzun bat bertan behera utzi

Utzi zure iruzkina