Mathematical Psychology

This project investigates mathematical psychology's historical and philosophical foundations to clarify its distinguishing characteristics and relationships to adjacent fields. Through gathering primary sources, histories, and interviews with researchers, author Prof. Colin Allen - University of Pittsburgh [1, 2, 3] and his students Osman Attah, Brendan Fleig-Goldstein, Mara McGuire, and Dzintra Ullis have identified three central questions:

What makes the use of mathematics in mathematical psychology reasonably effective, in contrast to other sciences like physics-inspired mathematical biology or symbolic cognitive science?
How does the mathematical approach in mathematical psychology differ from other branches of psychology, like psychophysics and psychometrics?
What is the appropriate relationship of mathematical psychology to cognitive science, given diverging perspectives on aligning with this field?

Preliminary findings emphasize data-driven modeling, skepticism of cognitive science alignments, and early reliance on computation. They will further probe the interplay with cognitive neuroscience and contrast rational-analysis approaches. By elucidating the motivating perspectives and objectives of different eras in mathematical psychology's development, they aim to understand its past and inform constructive dialogue on its philosophical foundations and future directions. This project intends to provide a conceptual roadmap for the field through integrated history and philosophy of science.

The Project: Integrating History and Philosophy of Mathematical Psychology

This project aims to integrate historical and philosophical perspectives to elucidate the foundations of mathematical psychology. As Norwood Hanson stated, history without philosophy is blind, while philosophy without history is empty. The goal is to find a middle ground between the contextual focus of history and the conceptual focus of philosophy.

The team acknowledges that all historical accounts are imperfect, but some can provide valuable insights. The history of mathematical psychology is difficult to tell without centering on the influential Stanford group. Tracing academic lineages and key events includes part of the picture, but more context is needed to fully understand the field's development.

The project draws on diverse sources, including research interviews, retrospective articles, formal histories, and online materials. More interviews and research will further flesh out the historical and philosophical foundations. While incomplete, the current analysis aims to identify important themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped mathematical psychology's evolution. Ultimately, the goal is an integrated historical and conceptual roadmap to inform contemporary perspectives on the field's identity and future directions.

The Rise of Mathematical Psychology

The history of efforts to mathematize psychology traces back to the quantitative imperative stemming from the Galilean scientific revolution. This imprinted the notion that proper science requires mathematics, leading to "physics envy" in other disciplines like psychology.

Many early psychologists argued psychology needed to become mathematical to be scientific. However, mathematizing psychology faced complications absent in the physical sciences. Objects in psychology were not readily present as quantifiable, provoking heated debates on whether psychometric and psychophysical measurements were meaningful.

Nonetheless, the desire to develop mathematical psychology persisted. Different approaches grappled with determining the appropriate role of mathematics in relation to psychological experiments and data. For example, Herbart favored starting with mathematics to ensure accuracy, while Fechner insisted experiments must come first to ground mathematics.

Tensions remain between data-driven versus theory-driven mathematization of psychology. Contemporary perspectives range from psychometric and psychophysical stances that foreground data to measurement-theoretical and computational approaches that emphasize formal models.

Elucidating how psychologists negotiated to apply mathematical methods to an apparently resistant subject matter helps reveal the evolving role and place of mathematics in psychology. This historical interplay shaped the emergence of mathematical psychology as a field.

The Distinctive Mathematical Approach of Mathematical Psychology

What sets mathematical psychology apart from other branches of psychology in its use of mathematics?

Several key aspects stand out:

Advocating quantitative methods broadly. Mathematical psychology emerged partly to push psychology to embrace quantitative modeling and mathematics beyond basic statistics.
Drawing from diverse mathematical tools. With greater training in mathematics, mathematical psychologists utilize more advanced and varied mathematical techniques like topology and differential geometry.
Linking models and experiments. Mathematical psychologists emphasize tightly connecting experimental design and statistical analysis, with experiments created to test specific models.
Favoring theoretical models. Mathematical psychology incorporates "pure" mathematical results and prefers analytic, hand-fitted models over data-driven computer models.
Seeking general, cumulative theory. Unlike just describing data, mathematical psychology aspires to abstract, general theory supported across experiments, cumulative progress in models, and mathematical insight into psychological mechanisms.

So while not unique to mathematical psychology, these key elements help characterize how its use of mathematics diverges from adjacent fields like psychophysics and psychometrics. Mathematical psychology carved out an identity embracing quantitative methods but also theoretical depth and broad generalization.

Situating Mathematical Psychology Relative to Cognitive Science

What is the appropriate perspective on mathematical psychology's relationship to cognitive psychology and cognitive science? While connected historically and conceptually, essential distinctions exist.

Mathematical psychology draws from diverse disciplines that are also influential in cognitive science, like computer science, psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience. However, mathematical psychology appears more skeptical of alignments with cognitive science.

For example, cognitive science prominently adopted the computer as a model of the human mind, while mathematical psychology focused more narrowly on computers as modeling tools.

Additionally, mathematical psychology seems to take a more critical stance towards purely simulation-based modeling in cognitive science, instead emphasizing iterative modeling tightly linked to experimentation.

Overall, mathematical psychology exhibits significant overlap with cognitive science but strongly asserts its distinct mathematical orientation and modeling perspectives. Elucidating this complex relationship remains an ongoing project, but preliminary analysis suggests mathematical psychology intentionally diverged from cognitive science in its formative development.

This establishes mathematical psychology's separate identity while retaining connections to adjacent disciplines at the intersection of mathematics, psychology, and computation.

Looking Ahead: Open Questions and Future Research

This historical and conceptual analysis of mathematical psychology's foundations has illuminated key themes, contrasts, and questions that shaped the field's development. Further research can build on these preliminary findings.

Additional work is needed to flesh out the fuller intellectual, social, and political context driving the evolution of mathematical psychology. Examining the influences and reactions of key figures will provide a richer picture.

Ongoing investigation can probe whether the identified tensions and contrasts represent historical artifacts or still animate contemporary debates. Do mathematical psychologists today grapple with similar questions on the role of mathematics and modeling?

Further analysis should also elucidate the nature of the purported bidirectional relationship between modeling and experimentation in mathematical psychology. As well, clarifying the diversity of perspectives on goals like generality, abstraction, and cumulative theory-building would be valuable.

Finally, this research aims to spur discussion on philosophical issues such as realism, pluralism, and progress in mathematical psychology models. Is the accuracy and truth value of models an important consideration or mainly beside the point? And where is the field headed - towards greater verisimilitude or an indefinite balancing of complexity and abstraction?

By spurring reflection on this conceptual foundation, this historical and integrative analysis hopes to provide a roadmap to inform constructive dialogue on mathematical psychology's identity and future trajectory.

The SDTEST^®

The SDTEST^® is a simple and fun tool to uncover our unique motivational values that use mathematical psychology of varying complexity.

The SDTEST^® helps us better understand ourselves and others on this lifelong path of self-discovery.

Here are reports of polls which SDTEST^® makes:

1) Veprimet e kompanive në lidhje me personelin në muajin e fundit (po / jo)

2) Veprimet e kompanive në raport me personelin në muajin e fundit (fakt në%)

3) Frikësoj

4) Problemet më të mëdha me të cilat përballet vendi im

5) Cilat cilësi dhe aftësi përdorin udhëheqësit e mirë kur ndërtojnë ekipe të suksesshme?

6) Google. Faktorët që ndikojnë në efikasitetin e ekipit

7) Përparësitë kryesore të punëkërkuesve

8) Makesfarë e bën një shef një udhëheqës të shkëlqyeshëm?

9) Makesfarë i bën njerëzit të suksesshëm në punë?

10) A jeni gati të merrni më pak pagë për të punuar nga distanca?

11) A ekziston ageism?

12) Ageism në karrierë

13) Ageism në jetë

14) Shkaqet e ageizmit

15) Arsyet pse njerëzit heqin dorë (nga Anna Vital)

16) BESIM (#WVS)

17) Sondazhi i lumturisë në Oksford

18) Mirëqenie psikologjike

19) Ku do të ishte mundësia juaj tjetër më tërheqëse?

20) Çfarë do të bëni këtë javë për t'u kujdesur për shëndetin tuaj mendor?

21) Unë jetoj duke menduar për të kaluarën time, të tashmen ose të ardhmen

22) Meritokraci

23) Inteligjenca artificiale dhe fundi i civilizimit

24) Pse njerëzit zvarriten?

25) Diferenca gjinore në ndërtimin e vetëbesimit (IFD Allensbach)

26) Xing.com Vlerësimi i Kulturës

27) Patrick Lencioni "Pesë Mosfunksionimet e një ekipi"

28) Empatia është ...

29) Isfarë është thelbësore për specialistët e IT në zgjedhjen e një oferte pune?

30) Pse njerëzit i rezistojnë ndryshimit (nga Siobhán McHale)

31) Si i rregulloni emocionet tuaja? (Nga Nawal Mustafa M.A.)

32) 21 Aftësi që ju paguajnë përgjithmonë (nga Jeremiah Teo / 赵汉昇)

33) Liria e vërtetë është ...

34) 12 mënyra për të ndërtuar besim me të tjerët (nga Justin Wright)

35) Karakteristikat e një punonjësi të talentuar (nga Instituti i Menaxhimit të Talentëve)

36) 10 çelësa për të motivuar ekipin tuaj

37) Algjebra e ndërgjegjes (nga Vladimir Lefebvre)

38) Tre mundësi të dallueshme të së ardhmes (nga Dr. Clare W. Graves)

Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll “Fears“. The full version of the results is available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.

Frikësoj

Charts Korrelacion

VUCA

Vlera kritike e koeficient korrelacioni

Shpërndarja normale, nga William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0331

Shpërndarje jo normale, nga Spearman r = 0.0013

Tregoni vetëm rezultate > r = 0.0331

Shpërndarje	Jo normal	Jo normal	Jo normal	Normal	Normal	Normal	Normal	Normal
Të gjitha pyetjet Të gjitha pyetjet Frika ime më e madhe është
Frika ime më e madhe është
Answer 1	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0562	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0311	Negative dobët -0.0164	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0903	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0301	Negative dobët -0.0120	Negative dobët -0.1534
Answer 2	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0217	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0011	Negative dobët -0.0455	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0660	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0440	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0117	Negative dobët -0.0942
Answer 3	-	Negative dobët -0.0034	Negative dobët -0.0104	Negative dobët -0.0419	Negative dobët -0.0451	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0462	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0780	Negative dobët -0.0204
Answer 4	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0436	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0362	Negative dobët -0.0177	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0150	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0296	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0189	Negative dobët -0.0984
Answer 5	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0298	Pozitiv i dobët 0.1270	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0133	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0724	Negative dobët -0.0002	Negative dobët -0.0199	Negative dobët -0.1742
Answer 6	-	Negative dobët -0.0003	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0089	Negative dobët -0.0627	Negative dobët -0.0074	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0190	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0825	Negative dobët -0.0321
Answer 7	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0123	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0388	Negative dobët -0.0684	Negative dobët -0.0238	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0468	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0631	Negative dobët -0.0517
Answer 8	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0699	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0857	Negative dobët -0.0318	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0150	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0341	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0125	Negative dobët -0.1372
Answer 9	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0666	Pozitiv i dobët 0.1681	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0094	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0694	Negative dobët -0.0131	Negative dobët -0.0533	Negative dobët -0.1815
Answer 10	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0776	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0744	Negative dobët -0.0185	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0224	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0352	Negative dobët -0.0135	Negative dobët -0.1293
Answer 11	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0585	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0531	Negative dobët -0.0094	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0086	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0195	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0313	Negative dobët -0.1200
Answer 12	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0378	Pozitiv i dobët 0.1030	Negative dobët -0.0357	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0350	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0261	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0297	Negative dobët -0.1510
Answer 13	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0642	Pozitiv i dobët 0.1044	Negative dobët -0.0454	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0259	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0424	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0183	Negative dobët -0.1595
Answer 14	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0718	Pozitiv i dobët 0.1034	Negative dobët -0.0003	Negative dobët -0.0085	Negative dobët -0.0016	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0074	Negative dobët -0.1172
Answer 15	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0550	Pozitiv i dobët 0.1382	Negative dobët -0.0418	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0181	Negative dobët -0.0163	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0211	Negative dobët -0.1183
Answer 16	-	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0591	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0276	Negative dobët -0.0384	Negative dobët -0.0397	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0651	Pozitiv i dobët 0.0280	Negative dobët -0.0710

Eksport në MS Excel

Kjo funksionalitet do të jetë në dispozicion në sondazhet tuaja të VUCA

Ne rregull

You can not only just create your poll in the Tarifë «projektuesi V.U.C.A sondazh» (with a unique link and your logo) but also you can earn money by selling its results in the Tarifë «Dyqan votimi», as already the authors of polls.

If you participated in VUCA polls, you can see your results and compare them with the overall polls results, which are constantly growing, in your personal account after purchasing Tarifë «My SDT»

[1] https://twitter.com/wileyprof

[2] https://colinallen.dnsalias.org

[3] https://philpeople.org/profiles/colin-allen

2023.10.13

Valerii Kosenko

Pronari i produktit SaaS Pet Project SDTEST®

Valerii u kualifikua si pedagog-psikolog social në 1993 dhe që atëherë ka zbatuar njohuritë e tij në menaxhimin e projektit.
Valerii mori një diplomë master dhe kualifikimin e menaxherit të projektit dhe programit në 2013. Gjatë programit të tij master, ai u njoh me hartën e rrugës së projektit (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Projektmanagement e. V.) dhe Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii mori teste të ndryshme të dinamikës spirale dhe përdori njohuritë dhe përvojën e tij për të përshtatur versionin aktual të SDTest.
Valerii është autori i eksplorimit të pasigurisë së V.U.C.A. Koncepti duke përdorur dinamikën spirale dhe statistikat matematikore në psikologji, më shumë se 20 sondazhe ndërkombëtare.

Ky postim ka 0 Komente

Ti përgjigjeni

Anuloni një përgjigje

Lini komentin tuaj